RESUMO CONTEXTO O estado nutricional de indivíduos com doença inflamatória intestinal está diretamente relacionado à gravidade da doença e associado a mau prognóstico e deterioração da competência imune. OBJETIVO Avaliar o status e a composição corporal de pacientes ambulatoriais com doença inflamatória intestinal. METÓDOS Foi conduzido um estudo transversal com avaliação clínica e nutricional de pacientes com doença de Crohn e colite ulcerativa. Pacientes foram classificados de acordo com o índice de atividade clínica Crohn’s Disease Activity Index e escore de Mayo. Avaliação nutricional foi composta peso atual, estatura, circunferência do braço, dobra cutânea tricipital e espessura do músculo adutor do polegar. Posteriormente, foram calculados índice de massa corporal, circunferência muscular do braço e área muscular do braço corrigida. O ângulo de fase e massa magra e massa gorda foram derivadas da bioimpedância elétrica. Foram realizados análise descritiva, teste de qui-quadrado ou exato de Fisher, teste t e ANOVA. RESULTADOS Foram avaliados 141 pacientes, sendo 54 (38,29%) com doença de Crohn e 87 (61,70%) com colite ulcerativa. A idade média foi de 43,98 (±15,68) anos em pacientes com doença de Crohn e 44,28 (±16,29) anos em pacientes com colite ulcerativa. A maioria dos pacientes estava em remissão clínica da doença (doença de Crohn: 88,89%; colite ulcerativa: 87,36%). O estado nutricional de acordo com o IMC foi 48,15% eutrófico e 40,74% sobrepeso/obesidade para doença de Crohn; entre os indivíduos com colite ulcerativa, 52,87% foram classificados como sobrepeso/obesidade. Ao se considerar dobra cutânea do tríceps, observou-se obesidade em ambos os grupos (doença de Crohn 75,93%; colite ulcerativa: 72,42%). Pacientes com doença de Crohn apresentam maiores variações de composição corporal quando comparados com pacientes com colite ulcerativa (IMC: 24,88 kg/m² x IMC: 26,56 kg/m², P=0,054; área do músculo do braço: 35,11mm x área do músculo do braço: 40,39 mm, P=0,040; ângulo de fase: 6,46° x ângulo de fase: 6,83°, P=0,006). CONCLUSÃO Pacientes com doença inflamatória intestinal apresentaram alta prevalência de sobrepeso e obesidade. Indivíduos com doença de Crohn apresentaram parâmetros de composição corporal e de antropometria mais comprometidos, quando comparados com indivíduos com colite ulcerativa.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND The nutritional status of individuals with inflammatory bowel diseases is directly related to the severity of the disease and is associated with poor prognosis and the deterioration of immune competence. OBJECTIVE To assess the nutritional status and the body composition of outpatients with inflammatory bowel diseases. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted with clinical and nutritional assessment of patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Patients were classified according to the clinical activity through Crohn’s Disease Activity Index and Mayo Score. Nutritional assessment consisted of anthropometric measurements of current weight, height, mid-arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness and thickness of adductor policis muscle, with subsequent calculation of BMI, arm muscle circumference and the mid-arm muscle area (MAMA). The phase angle (PhA) and lean and fat mass were obtained with the use of electrical bioimpedance. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test or Fisher exact test, ANOVA and t-test. RESULTS We evaluated 141 patients of which 54 (38.29%) had Crohn’s disease and 87 (61.70%) ulcerative colitis. The mean age was 43.98 (±15.68) years in Crohn’s disease and 44.28 (±16.29) years for ulcerative colitis. Most of the patients were in clinical remission of the disease (Crohn’s disease: 88.89%; ulcerative colitis: 87.36%). Regarding the nutritional classification using BMI, it was found that 48.15% of Crohn’s disease patients were eutrophic and 40.74% were overweight or obese; among patients with ulcerative colitis, 52.87% were classified as overweight or obese. When considering the triceps skinfold, it was observed in both groups a high percentage of overweight and obesity (Crohn’s disease: 75.93%; ulcerative colitis: 72.42%). Crohn’s disease patients showed the most affected nutritional status according to the nutritional variables when compared to patients with ulcerative colitis (BMI: 24.88 kg/m² x BMI: 26.56 kg/m², P=0.054; MAMA: 35.11 mm x MAMA: 40.39 mm, P=0.040; PhA: 6.46° x PhA: 6.83°, P=0.006). CONCLUSION Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases have a high prevalence of overweight and obesity. Crohn’s disease patients had more impaired anthropometric and body composition indicators when compared to patients with ulcerative colitis.

PURPOSE: Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with advanced liver disease (LD) related to multifactorial causes. Fluid retention can underestimate the nutritional status based on anthropometric measures. We evaluated nutritional indicators and body composition (BC) in patients with liver cirrhosis and correlated them with LD severity. METHODS: Forty three patients with LD enrolled for liver transplantation were evaluated by Anthropometric measures, subjective evaluation (Global Assessment of Nutritional Status - SGA) and biochemical indicators. Single-frequency electrical bioimpedance (SFE-BIA) was used to evaluate body composition (BC). It measured resistance (R), reactance (Xc) and the phase angle (PA). LD severity was estimated by Child-Pugh and Meld criteria (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease). RESULTS: Child-Pugh index between patients was 7.11±1.70 and Meld was 12.23±4.22. Arm Circumference, Arm Muscle Circumference and Arm Muscle Area, SGA, hemoglobin, hematocrit and albumin showed better correlation with disease severity. Xc and PA showed correlation both with Meld and Child-Pugh score when BC were evaluated. PA was depleted in 55.8% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of malnutrition varied according to the method. Global assessment of nutritional status showed better correlation with disease severity than with objective methods. Single-frequency electrical bioimpedance for body composition analysis in cirrhotic patients must be cautiously used; however, primary vectors seems to be valid and promising in clinical practice.